S. Nathan & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

S. Nathan & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 400

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 12, 1956

DocketNo. 59834; protest 236472-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 400 (S. Nathan & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. Nathan & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 400 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that at the time the merchandise in question was exported from Czechoslovakia “the Presidential Proclamation, T. D. 52837, withdrawing reduced rates of duty on articles the growth, produce or manufacture of Czechoslovakia had not been promulgated” and that the garnets in question are subject to the reduced rate of duty under paragraph 1528, as modified, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that at the time the merchandise in question was exported from Czechoslovakia “the Presidential Proclamation, T. D. 52837, withdrawing reduced rates of duty on articles the growth, produce or manufacture of Czechoslovakia had not been promulgated” and that the garnets in question are subject to the reduced rate of duty under paragraph 1528, as modified, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-nathan-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.