S. Nathan & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

S. Nathan & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 400

United States Customs Court·Decided April 12, 1956·No. No. 59834; protest 236472-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that at the time the merchandise in question was exported from Czechoslovakia “the Presidential Proclamation, T. D. 52837, withdrawing reduced rates of duty on articles the growth, produce or manufacture of Czechoslovakia had not been promulgated” and that the garnets in question are subject to the reduced rate of duty under paragraph 1528, as modified, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that at the time the merchandise in question was exported from Czechoslovakia “the Presidential Proclamation, T. D. 52837, withdrawing reduced rates of duty on articles the growth, produce or manufacture of Czechoslovakia had not been promulgated” and that the garnets in question are subject to the reduced rate of duty under paragraph 1528, as modified, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

S. Nathan & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 400 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 400 (S. Nathan & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.