S. Muscle v. A. Santin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S. Muscle v. A. Santin. Read the opinion of the Court — 2024 MT 30
Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 2022·No. DA 22-0600·Unpublished

Opinion

12/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0600

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0600

SALVATRICE MUSCLE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

ANTONIO SANTIN, M.D.,

Defendant and Appellee.

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT THOMAS A. MARRA, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this N/A.

6H Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Allen Page Lanning, allenplanninglaw@gmail.com Gary Darling Kalkstein, gkalkstein@hallboothsmith.com Joe J. Newman, joe@kalksteinlaw.com Thomas Anthony Marra, tmarra@marralawfirm.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S. Muscle v. A. Santin, (Mo. 2022).

S. Muscle v. A. Santin (S. Muscle v. A. Santin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.