S & M, LLC v. Burchel

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

S & M, LLC v. Burchel

120 So. 3d 517, 2013 WL 135855, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 12

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S & M, LLC v. Burchel. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 150 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 11, 2013·No. 2110242·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BRYAN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Aabama. Ex parte S & M, LLC, d/b/a Huntsville Cab Co., 120 So.3d 509 (Ala.2012). On remand to this court and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with the supreme court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BRYAN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Aabama. Ex parte S & M, LLC, d/b/a Huntsville Cab Co., 120 So.3d 509 (Ala.2012). On remand to this court and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with the supreme court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

S & M, LLC v. Burchel, 120 So. 3d 517, 2013 WL 135855, 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 12 (Ala. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

120 So. 3d 517 (S & M, LLC v. Burchel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related