S. Leanne Galloway, Individually, and S. Leanne Galloway, as Mother and Next Friend of Conner Galloway, a Minor v. Allstate Insurance Company

958 F.2d 381, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12040, 1992 WL 49788
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 17, 1992
Docket91-6328
StatusPublished

This text of 958 F.2d 381 (S. Leanne Galloway, Individually, and S. Leanne Galloway, as Mother and Next Friend of Conner Galloway, a Minor v. Allstate Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S. Leanne Galloway, Individually, and S. Leanne Galloway, as Mother and Next Friend of Conner Galloway, a Minor v. Allstate Insurance Company, 958 F.2d 381, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12040, 1992 WL 49788 (10th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

958 F.2d 381

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

S. Leanne GALLOWAY, individually, and S. Leanne Galloway, as
mother and next friend of Conner Galloway, a
minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6328.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 17, 1992.

Before JOHN P. MOORE, TACHA, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellants appeal an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, Allstate Insurance Company. On appeal, appellants contend that they are entitled to stack their underinsured motorist insurance benefits. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
958 F.2d 381, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12040, 1992 WL 49788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-leanne-galloway-individually-and-s-leanne-gallow-ca10-1992.