S. L. Distributing Co. v. Laden
123 A. 926, 99 N.J.L. 525, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 184
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chan cellos, Chief Justice, Trengharb, Parker, Minturn, Campbell, Heppenheimee, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 10.
For reversal — FTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
S. L. Distributing Co. v. Laden, 123 A. 926, 99 N.J.L. 525, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1924).
123 A. 926 (S. L. Distributing Co. v. Laden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Milk v. Mulcahey
32 A.2d 598 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)