S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual
This text of S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual (S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 06-1911 ___________
S. Keith Curran; Rhonda Curran, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., * * [PUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________
Submitted: November 17, 2006 Filed: December 18, 2006 ___________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.
Affirmed. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-keith-curran-v-washington-mutual-ca8-2006.