S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2006·No. 06-1911·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 06-1911 ___________

S. Keith Curran; Rhonda Curran, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., * * [PUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: November 17, 2006 Filed: December 18, 2006 ___________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.

Affirmed. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual, (8th Cir. 2006).

S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual (S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eddie Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.
457 F.3d 781 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)