S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

Eighth Circuit

S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

471 F.3d 857, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31062, 2006 WL 3716726

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2006·No. 06-1911·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court 1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.

Affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court 1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.

Affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., 471 F.3d 857, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31062, 2006 WL 3716726 (8th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

471 F.3d 857 (S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related