S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

471 F.3d 857, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31062, 2006 WL 3716726
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 2006
Docket06-1911
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 471 F.3d 857 (S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., 471 F.3d 857, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31062, 2006 WL 3716726 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court 1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.

Affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danzig v. LoanMe, Inc.
E.D. Missouri, 2021
Smith v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.
222 F. App'x 533 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F.3d 857, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31062, 2006 WL 3716726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-keith-curran-rhonda-curran-v-washington-mutual-bank-fa-ca8-2006.