S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.
This text of 471 F.3d 857 (S. Keith Curran Rhonda Curran v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court 1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.
Affirmed.
. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F.3d 857, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31062, 2006 WL 3716726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-keith-curran-rhonda-curran-v-washington-mutual-bank-fa-ca8-2006.