S. K. S. Holding Co. v. Vans Agnew

Supreme Court of Florida

S. K. S. Holding Co. v. Vans Agnew

140 So. 313, 103 Fla. 686

DecidedNovember 24, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 313 (S. K. S. Holding Co. v. Vans Agnew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. K. S. Holding Co. v. Vans Agnew, 140 So. 313, 103 Fla. 686 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that no error is duly shown in the order of the Circuit Judge affirming an order of the County Judge in so far as the latter order adjudges that the executrix “is not compelled to account for Nine Thousand ($9,000.00) *687 Dollars” which is stated to he one-half of the amount received by her from the sale of land including her decedent's homestead real estate, which stated order of the County Judge is affirmed without prejudice to other matters in the transcript, other questions sought to be presented not being reviewable on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that no error is duly shown in the order of the Circuit Judge affirming an order of the County Judge in so far as the latter order adjudges that the executrix “is not compelled to account for Nine Thousand ($9,000.00) *687 Dollars” which is stated to he one-half of the amount received by her from the sale of land including her decedent's homestead real estate, which stated order of the County Judge is affirmed without prejudice to other matters in the transcript, other questions sought to be presented not being reviewable on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 313, 103 Fla. 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-k-s-holding-co-v-vans-agnew-fla-1931.