S. Jarvis Adams Co. v. Bossert

Sixth Circuit

S. Jarvis Adams Co. v. Bossert

121 F. 1021, 58 C.C.A. 681, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 4, 1903

DocketNo. 1,133

StatusPublished

This text of 121 F. 1021 (S. Jarvis Adams Co. v. Bossert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. Jarvis Adams Co. v. Bossert, 121 F. 1021, 58 C.C.A. 681, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730 (6th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This cause comes from the same court and is like that of S. Jarvis Adams Company v. Knapp (just decided) 121 Fed. 34, in all particulars, and for the reasons given in our opinion in that case requires a like decision. The cases were argued and submitted together. The decree must be reversed, and remanded to the court below, with instructions to take further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court.

DAY, Circuit Judge, participated in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This cause comes from the same court and is like that of S. Jarvis Adams Company v. Knapp (just decided) 121 Fed. 34, in all particulars, and for the reasons given in our opinion in that case requires a like decision. The cases were argued and submitted together. The decree must be reversed, and remanded to the court below, with instructions to take further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court.

DAY, Circuit Judge, participated in the decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 F. 1021, 58 C.C.A. 681, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-jarvis-adams-co-v-bossert-ca6-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack