S. & J. Mercury Cab v. Eibister

168 So. 2d 136
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 27, 1964·No. Nos. 33140, 33230·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross petition for certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S. & J. Mercury Cab v. Eibister, 168 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 1964).

168 So. 2d 136 (S. & J. Mercury Cab v. Eibister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisher v. Carroll Daniel Fisher Construction Co.
212 So. 2d 289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
S. & J. Mercury Cab v. Eibister
190 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)