S. Hekemian & Co. v. Rivara

6 A.2d 392, 122 N.J.L. 523, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 347
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 21, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.2d 392 (S. Hekemian & Co. v. Rivara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S. Hekemian & Co. v. Rivara, 6 A.2d 392, 122 N.J.L. 523, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 347 (N.J. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case. Donges, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.2d 392, 122 N.J.L. 523, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-hekemian-co-v-rivara-nj-1939.