S. Hata Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

S. Hata Co. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 318, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3735

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 28, 1963

DocketNo. 67778; protest 61/24764, etc. (Honolulu)

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cust. Ct. 318 (S. Hata Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. Hata Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 318, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3735 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items referred to in the invoices as S-l, S-2, S-3, S-4, and S-5, cups, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 20 percent ad valorem; the items referred to as S-10, teapots; S-ll, sugar bowls; S-12, creamers; S-14, wine cups; S-29, mugs; and S-37, kettles for teapots, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 25 percent ad valorem; and the items referred to as S-13, wine bottles, and S-17, ashtrays, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 30 percent ad valorem, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items referred to in the invoices as S-l, S-2, S-3, S-4, and S-5, cups, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 20 percent ad valorem; the items referred to as S-10, teapots; S-ll, sugar bowls; S-12, creamers; S-14, wine cups; S-29, mugs; and S-37, kettles for teapots, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 25 percent ad valorem; and the items referred to as S-13, wine bottles, and S-17, ashtrays, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 30 percent ad valorem, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cust. Ct. 318, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-hata-co-v-united-states-cusc-1963.