S. H. v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

S. H. v. State

248 S.E.2d 22, 147 Ga. App. 63, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2614

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 13, 1978

Docket56146

StatusPublished

This text of 248 S.E.2d 22 (S. H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. H. v. State, 248 S.E.2d 22, 147 Ga. App. 63, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2614 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

• Is the 18-year-old appellant, who committed an act of delinquency and was placed under the supervision of the [64]*64juvenile court prior to the age of 17, still subject to the jurisdiction of that court even though the age of majority in Georgia is 18? The answer, yes, was recently provided by Judge Quillian in W. F. v. State of Ga., 144 Ga. App. 523 (241 SE2d 631) (1978). We have considered counsel’s resourceful arguments why we should overrule that recent decision, but we conclude the decision is soundly reasoned and correct.

Argued June 28, 1978 Decided July 13, 1978 Rehearing denied July 31, 1978 Hendrix & Shea, Guerry R. Thornton, Jr., for appellant. Andrew J. Ryan, III, District Attorney, Martin S. Jacket, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

• Is the 18-year-old appellant, who committed an act of delinquency and was placed under the supervision of the [64]*64juvenile court prior to the age of 17, still subject to the jurisdiction of that court even though the age of majority in Georgia is 18? The answer, yes, was recently provided by Judge Quillian in W. F. v. State of Ga., 144 Ga. App. 523 (241 SE2d 631) (1978). We have considered counsel’s resourceful arguments why we should overrule that recent decision, but we conclude the decision is soundly reasoned and correct.

Argued June 28, 1978 Decided July 13, 1978 Rehearing denied July 31, 1978 Hendrix & Shea, Guerry R. Thornton, Jr., for appellant. Andrew J. Ryan, III, District Attorney, Martin S. Jacket, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 S.E.2d 22, 147 Ga. App. 63, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-h-v-state-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack