S. H. Kress and Company v. Evelyn Handorf

Fifth Circuit

S. H. Kress and Company v. Evelyn Handorf

234 F.2d 526, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3723

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 1956

Docket15891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 F.2d 526 (S. H. Kress and Company v. Evelyn Handorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. H. Kress and Company v. Evelyn Handorf, 234 F.2d 526, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3723 (5th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a jury’s verdict appellee was awarded a judgment for $6,500 for pei'sonal injuries sustained by her when she fell in appellant’s store. The specifications of error all depend upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. Our examination of the record convinces us that there was sufficient evidence, if believed by the jury, to authorize its verdict.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a jury’s verdict appellee was awarded a judgment for $6,500 for pei'sonal injuries sustained by her when she fell in appellant’s store. The specifications of error all depend upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. Our examination of the record convinces us that there was sufficient evidence, if believed by the jury, to authorize its verdict.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 F.2d 526, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-h-kress-and-company-v-evelyn-handorf-ca5-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack