S & H Clinton Assoc., LLC v. Cherry

73 Misc. 3d 145(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51244(U)
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S & H Clinton Assoc., LLC v. Cherry. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 Misc. 3d 134(A)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 16, 2021·No. 2021-165 N C·Unpublished

Opinion

S & H Clinton Assoc., LLC v Cherry (2021 NY Slip Op 51244(U)) [*1]

S & H Clinton Assoc., LLC v Cherry
2021 NY Slip Op 51244(U) [73 Misc 3d 145(A)]
Decided on December 16, 2021
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected in part through January 31, 2022; it will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on December 16, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, P.J., JERRY GARGUILO, HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ
2021-165 N C

S & H Clinton Associates, LLC, Respondent,

against

Tyrone Cherry, Appellant.


Tyrone Cherry, appellant pro se. Horing, Welikson & Rosen P.C. for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Scott Fairgrieve, J.), dated October 29, 2019. The order denied tenant's motion for, in effect, leave to reargue his motion made upon alleged newly-discovered evidence to "[r]e-open [the] case" in a nonpayment summary proceeding.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

In this nonpayment proceeding to recover possession of a rent-stabilized apartment, by order dated December 14, 2018, the District Court denied tenant's postjudgment motion to "[r]e-open [the] case" based on purported newly-discovered evidence regarding the service of the rent notice, the notice of petition and the petition. Tenant then moved for, in effect, leave to reargue that prior motion and now appeals from an order of the District Court dated October 29, 2019, wherein the District Court denied tenant's motion. However, it is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see U.S. Bank N.A. v McCaffery, 186 AD3d 897, 899 [2020]; Liang v Yi Jing Tan, 155 AD3d 1022, 1023 [2017]).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

RUDERMAN, P.J., and VOUTSINAS, J., concur.

GARGUILO, J., taking no part.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 16, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S & H Clinton Assoc., LLC v. Cherry, 73 Misc. 3d 145(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51244(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

73 Misc. 3d 145(A) (S & H Clinton Assoc., LLC v. Cherry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liang v. Yi Jing Tan
2017 NY Slip Op 8363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. McCaffery
2020 NY Slip Op 04805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)