S. F. Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indem. Co.

California Court of Appeal

S. F. Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indem. Co.

106 P. 113, 11 Cal. App. 701

California Court of Appeal·Decided November 10, 1909·No. Civ. No. 645.·Published

Opinion

In the above-entitled cause it has been stipulated by the respective parties that the matters to be determined by this court are identical with the matters to be determined in the cause bearing the same title but numbered in the trial court No. 3619, ante, p. 695, [106 P. 111], and that the judgment of this court may be the same in both cases. In the case numbered in the trial court No. 3619 we have this day affirmed the judgment and order appealed from. It is therefore ordered in accordance with the aforesaid stipulation that in the case numbered No. 11 in the trial court, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Hall, J., and Cooper, P. J., concurred. *Page 702

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the above-entitled cause it has been stipulated by the respective parties that the matters to be determined by this court are identical with the matters to be determined in the cause bearing the same title but numbered in the trial court No. 3619, ante, p. 695, [106 P. 111], and that the judgment of this court may be the same in both cases. In the case numbered in the trial court No. 3619 we have this day affirmed the judgment and order appealed from. It is therefore ordered in accordance with the aforesaid stipulation that in the case numbered No. 11 in the trial court, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Hall, J., and Cooper, P. J., concurred. *Page 702

S. F. Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indem. Co., 106 P. 113, 11 Cal. App. 701 (Cal. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

106 P. 113 (S. F. Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indem. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related