S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Kotsmith

136 N.W. 1135, 117 Minn. 536, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 818
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 24, 1912
DocketNos. 17,501—(92)
StatusPublished

This text of 136 N.W. 1135 (S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Kotsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Kotsmith, 136 N.W. 1135, 117 Minn. 536, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 818 (Mich. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order vacating an order for judgment and reinstating the cause for trial upon the issues made by the pleadings. An examination of the record presents no sufficient reasons for a reversal. The order appealed from was within the discretion of the trial court, and we are unable to say that the discretion was abused.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.W. 1135, 117 Minn. 536, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-f-bowser-co-v-kotsmith-minn-1912.