S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States

198 Ct. Cl. 1007, 193 Ct. Cl. 335
United States Court of Claims·Decided May 17, 1971·No. Court of Claims Case No. 104-67·Published

Opinion

On writ of certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Claims (193 Ct. Cl. 335, 433 F. 2d 1373), holding (1) that a refusal by defendant (the Atomic Energy Commission) to pay a Board award is not a breach of the disputes clause of the contract in issue if the involved award is not supported by substantia;! evidence or otherwise is not entitled to finality under the Wunderlich Act, and (2) that the Government has the right to the same extent as the contractor to seek judicial review of an unfavorable administrative decision on a contract claim, the Supreme Court granted [1008] certiorari on May 17, 1971 (402 U.S. 971), and on April 24, 1972 (406 U.S. 1), in reversing the Court of Claims, held that the Atomic Energy Commission had exclusive administrative authority under the disputes clause procedure to resolve the dispute in issue, and neither the contract between the parties nor the Wunderlich Act permitted still further administrative review by the General Accounting Office. The Supreme Court also held that the Wunderlich Act does not confer upon the Department of Justice the right to appeal from a decision of an administrative agency, nor is this a case involving a contractor’s fraud, concerning which the Department has broad powers to act under several statutory provisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 1007, 193 Ct. Cl. 335 (cc 1971).

198 Ct. Cl. 1007 (S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United States
406 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1972)
S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United States
433 F.2d 1373 (Court of Claims, 1970)