S. E. and K. D. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 8, 2022
Docket03-22-00273-CV
StatusPublished

This text of S. E. and K. D. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (S. E. and K. D. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S. E. and K. D. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00273-CV

S. E. and K. D., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. C200139CPS, THE HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant S.E. filed notice of appeal on April 28, 2022. Appellant K.D. filed

notice of appeal with the trial court on May 20, 2022, and again on May 31, 2022. S.E.’s brief

was due June 6, 2022, but on June 3, 2022, he filed a motion for extension of the briefing

deadline, asking for a new deadline “twenty (20) days after the reporter’s record concerning the

De Novo appeal has been filed.” Appellee, the Department of Family and Protective Services,

has filed a “Notice to the Court” asking for abatement of this case until the record is complete.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in

granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion. The requested record was filed June 6, 2022, and we therefore order counselors Daniel Clark and Jenny Henley to file

appellants’ briefs no later than Monday, June 27, 2022. If the briefs are not filed by that date,

counsel may be required to show cause as to why they should not be held in contempt. To the

extent appellee’s Notice was intended as a motion to abate, we dismiss that motion as moot in

light of the filing of the record.

It is ordered on June 8, 2022.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
S. E. and K. D. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-e-and-k-d-v-texas-department-of-family-and-protective-services-texapp-2022.