S. C. v. A. C.

319 A.2d 733, 128 N.J. Super. 198, 1974 N.J. Super. LEXIS 658
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided May 3, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Consodine reported at 123 N. J. Super. 566 (Ch. Div. 1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S. C. v. A. C., 319 A.2d 733, 128 N.J. Super. 198, 1974 N.J. Super. LEXIS 658 (N.J. Ct. App. 1974).

319 A.2d 733 (S. C. v. A. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Finkle
319 A.2d 733 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)