S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial Bank of High Point

204 N.C. 432
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 29, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 204 N.C. 432 (S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial Bank of High Point) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial Bank of High Point, 204 N.C. 432 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

ConNoe, J.

There was error in tbe order denying tbe motion of tbe defendant, tbe Union Mortgage and Investment Company, and directing [434]*434the receiver appointed by the court in the action to distribute the sum of money now in his hands and collected by him during the pendency of the action, as rents from the property conveyed to trustees by the defendant, East Carolina Motor Company, to secure its note recited in the deed of trust, among the general creditors of the East Carolina Motor Company.

Ordinarily, a mortgagee or creditor secured by a deed of trust, has no right to collect the rents or other income from property conveyed by the mortgage or deed of trust, even after default in the payment of the secured indebtedness. This right arises only after the mortgagee or trustee has taken possession of the property conveyed by the mortgage or deed of trust, by consent or pursuant to an order or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction; but, where, as in the instant case, a receiver appointed by the court in an action involving the right to foreclose the mortgage or deed of trust, has taken possession of the property and collected the rents or income from the property during the pendency of the action, under the orders of the court, such rents or income should be applied as a payment on the secured indebtedness, when the amount realized from the sale of the property is not sufficient to pay the indebtedness or the judgment for the same.

If the law were otherwise, a grave injustice to the creditor would result.

On the facts appearing on the record in this appeal, the rents cpl-lected by the receiver, should be applied as a payment on the judgment. The order to the contrary is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Westchase I Associates, L.P.
119 B.R. 521 (W.D. North Carolina, 1990)
Gregg v. Williamson
98 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 N.C. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-b-parker-co-v-commercial-bank-of-high-point-nc-1933.