S. A. Clark Lunch Co. v. Cleveland Waiters Local

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 669
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 20, 1926·No. No. 19996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This action was brought originally in the Cuyahoga Common Pleas by the S. A. Clark Lunch Company against Cleveland Waiters & Beverage Dispenser Local Union No. 106, for an injunction restraining the union from attempting to cause a boycott and peaceful picketing.

It appears that pursuant to the refusal by the Lunch Company to employ union labor and pay union wages that the union established pickets outside the Lunch Company’s place of business who passed out cards stating that the Lunch Company was unfair to union labor and who attempted to influence prospective customers from patronizing the Lunch Company.

The judgment of the Common Pleas dismissed the petition and on appeal the Court of Appeals did likewise.

The Lunch Company in the Supreme Court contends:

1. That the efforts of the Union is causing ruination to its business.

2. That it is entitled to an injunction restraining the picketting complained of.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S. A. Clark Lunch Co. v. Cleveland Waiters Local, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 669 (Ohio 1926).

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 669 (S. A. Clark Lunch Co. v. Cleveland Waiters Local) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saltzman v. United Retail Employees' Local No. 112
25 Ohio Law. Abs. 354 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1937)