RZ v. Department of Children and Families
This text of 969 So. 2d 1225 (RZ v. Department of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R.Z., Father of Z.Z. And C.Z., Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Kimberly F. Pell, Panama City, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Department of Children and Families, Ama N. Appiah, Orlando, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal, brought by the father in this dependency case, was not filed within 30 days of the date of rendition of the Order of Adjudication, entered December 1, 2006. Therefore, the appellant's notice of appeal did not timely invoke this Court's jurisdiction, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to the appellant's right to seek relief in the trial court, see In the Interest of E.H., 609 So.2d 1289 (Fla.1992); A.G. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 846 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.270(b), or to bring a timely appeal from the final order of disposition, A.G. v. Dep't *1226 of Children & Family Servs., 731 So.2d 1260 (Fla.1999).
DISMISSED.
ALLEN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
969 So. 2d 1225, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 19955, 2007 WL 4372839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rz-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2007.