Ryvers v. Woolridge v. Northeast Oklahoma Railroad Company, a Corporation

Tenth Circuit

Ryvers v. Woolridge v. Northeast Oklahoma Railroad Company, a Corporation

222 F.2d 956

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 1955

Docket5010_1

StatusPublished

This text of 222 F.2d 956 (Ryvers v. Woolridge v. Northeast Oklahoma Railroad Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryvers v. Woolridge v. Northeast Oklahoma Railroad Company, a Corporation, 222 F.2d 956 (10th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

222 F.2d 956

Ryvers V. WOOLRIDGE
v.
NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation.

No. 5010.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 13, 1955.

Rex H. Holden, Oklahoma City, Okl., and Philip B. Lush, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

B. W. Tabor, Tulsa, Okl., and Wallace, Wallace & Owens, Miami, Okl., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

222 F.2d 956

Ryvers V. WOOLRIDGE
v.
NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation.

No. 5010.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

April 13, 1955.

Rex H. Holden, Oklahoma City, Okl., and Philip B. Lush, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

B. W. Tabor, Tulsa, Okl., and Wallace, Wallace & Owens, Miami, Okl., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 F.2d 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryvers-v-woolridge-v-northeast-oklahoma-railroad-c-ca10-1955.