Rysdam v. Rysdam

84 P.2d 112, 160 Or. 153, 1938 Ore. LEXIS 114
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 2, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 P.2d 112 (Rysdam v. Rysdam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rysdam v. Rysdam, 84 P.2d 112, 160 Or. 153, 1938 Ore. LEXIS 114 (Or. 1938).

Opinion

BELT, J.

This is a divorce proceeding wherein the defendant is charged with cruel and inhuman treatment. Defendant, after denying the allegations of cruelty, answered by way of a cross complaint, alleging that plaintiff was guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment towards him. The trial court rendered a decree of divorce in favor of plaintiff, awarding her custody of the three minor children and certain interests in the real property owned by defendant. From this decree, the defendant appeals.

*154 There are no questions of law involved. The decision hinges solely upon questions of fact concerning which there is a direct conflict in the evidence. The able and experienced trial judge, who saw and heard the witnesses testify, is better able to determine the truth than we who are compelled to make deductions from the cold record. A consideration of the testimony, however, convinces us that the findings of the lower court are supported by the greater weight of the evidence.

It follows that the decree is affirmed.

Rossman and Kelly, JJ., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hollingsworth v. Hollingsworth
229 P.2d 956 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1951)
Evans v. Evans
157 P.2d 495 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 P.2d 112, 160 Or. 153, 1938 Ore. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rysdam-v-rysdam-or-1938.