Ryno Van Der Merwe v. Vanter Cruise Global, Inc.
This text of Ryno Van Der Merwe v. Vanter Cruise Global, Inc. (Ryno Van Der Merwe v. Vanter Cruise Global, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-13586 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
RYNO VAN DER MERWE, individually, and as legal guardian for wife, Elis Carneiro Pereira, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VANTER CRUISE GLOBAL, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2 Opinion of the Court 24-13586
D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-22643-KMM ____________________
Before BRANCH, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. The district court’s order remanding the action to Florida state court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction is unre- viewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (providing that a district court shall remand any case in which it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to the state court from which it was removed, and such a remand order is not reviewable on appeal); see also New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc., 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ryno Van Der Merwe v. Vanter Cruise Global, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryno-van-der-merwe-v-vanter-cruise-global-inc-ca11-2024.