Ryland v. Regions Bank
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION HOMER LEE RYLAND, JR. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:23-CV-137-SA-DAS REGIONS BANK, e¢ al. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On October 16, 2023, Ryland filed his Complaint [1], along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [2]. Magistrate Judge Sanders set a Spears hearing for February 22, 2024. Although a copy of the notice of hearing was mailed to Ryland at the address listed on the docket, he did not appear for the hearing. See [8]. Therefore, on February 26, 2024, Magistrate Judge Sanders entered a Report and Recommendation [9], recommending that Ryland’s case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Despite being given an opportunity to object to the dismissal recommendation, Ryland has not done so, and his deadline to do so has now passed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (Sth Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation [9] and the record as a whole. Having done so, the Court agrees with the recommendation. It is ADOPTED IN FULL. The Complaint [1] is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. This CASE is CLOSED. SO ORDERED, this the 12th day of March, 2024. /s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ryland v. Regions Bank (Ryland v. Regions Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.