Ryland v. Regions Bank

N.D. Mississippi

Ryland v. Regions Bank

DecidedMarch 12, 2024

Docket1:23-cv-00137

StatusUnknown

This text of Ryland v. Regions Bank (Ryland v. Regions Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryland v. Regions Bank, (N.D. Miss. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION HOMER LEE RYLAND, JR. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:23-CV-137-SA-DAS REGIONS BANK, e¢ al. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On October 16, 2023, Ryland filed his Complaint [1], along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [2]. Magistrate Judge Sanders set a Spears hearing for February 22, 2024. Although a copy of the notice of hearing was mailed to Ryland at the address listed on the docket, he did not appear for the hearing. See [8]. Therefore, on February 26, 2024, Magistrate Judge Sanders entered a Report and Recommendation [9], recommending that Ryland’s case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Despite being given an opportunity to object to the dismissal recommendation, Ryland has not done so, and his deadline to do so has now passed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (Sth Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation [9] and the record as a whole. Having done so, the Court agrees with the recommendation. It is ADOPTED IN FULL. The Complaint [1] is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. This CASE is CLOSED. SO ORDERED, this the 12th day of March, 2024. /s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION HOMER LEE RYLAND, JR. PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:23-CV-137-SA-DAS REGIONS BANK, e¢ al. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On October 16, 2023, Ryland filed his Complaint [1], along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [2]. Magistrate Judge Sanders set a Spears hearing for February 22, 2024. Although a copy of the notice of hearing was mailed to Ryland at the address listed on the docket, he did not appear for the hearing. See [8]. Therefore, on February 26, 2024, Magistrate Judge Sanders entered a Report and Recommendation [9], recommending that Ryland’s case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Despite being given an opportunity to object to the dismissal recommendation, Ryland has not done so, and his deadline to do so has now passed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (Sth Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation [9] and the record as a whole. Having done so, the Court agrees with the recommendation. It is ADOPTED IN FULL. The Complaint [1] is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. This CASE is CLOSED. SO ORDERED, this the 12th day of March, 2024. /s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ryland v. Regions Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryland-v-regions-bank-msnd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack