Ryland v. Callison

54 Mo. 513
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

John E. Ryland, plaintiff, became the purchaser at execution sale of certain lands once owned by defendant James B. Callison, but which had been conveyed by the latter to his sister-in-law. This suit is brought to set aside that conveyance on the ground that it was made to hinder, delay and defraud Callison’s creditors; and the evidence adduced ou the trial leaves [515] no room for doubt, that such was the intent which prompted the execution of the deed in question. The law is well settled in this State, that, where a debtor conveys his land with the fraudulent design above mentioned, a resulting trust is thereby created in favor of his creditors, and is the subject of excution sale. And it is equally well settled, that a purchaser at such sale will occupy as advantageous a position as though he were a creditor,when proceeding to set aside the debtor’s conveyance on the ground of fraud.

This disposes of the only questions of practical importance in this case, and the result is, that the judgment must be affirmed.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryland v. Callison, 54 Mo. 513 (Mo. 1874).

54 Mo. 513 (Ryland v. Callison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDaniel v. Sprick
249 S.W. 611 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1923)
Oldham v. Wade
200 S.W. 1053 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1918)
Bradshaw v. Halpin
79 S.W. 685 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
Rinehart v. Long
95 Mo. 396 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1888)
Lionberger v. Baker
88 Mo. 447 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Forster v. Mullanphy Planing Mill Co.
16 Mo. App. 150 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
Boyer v. Tucker
70 Mo. 457 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)
Matson v. Capelle
62 Mo. 235 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1876)