Ryerson v. Kitchell
This text of 3 N.J.L. 168 (Ryerson v. Kitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The defendant in this suit, when instituted before Justice Manderville, filed a plea in writing to the demand of the plaintiff, in which, plea lie expressly admitted himself to owe to the plaintiff, twenty-eight shillings and six pence, which he there tenders to the plaintiff, but does not pay it into Court. Upon the hearing of the cause, the justice renders a judgment for the plaintiff for $57 21 and g>5 53 cents costs. From this judgment there was an appeal to the Common Pleas of Morris, and there that judgment was reversed, and a new judgment entered for the defendant.
This judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, is now before this Court by certiorari; and I am of opinion, that it must be reversed. The defendant admits himself by his plea, to owe a certain sum; the tendering that sum to the plaintiff, is no payment; upon the plea itself, therefore, judgment ought to have been for the plaintiff.
The other Justices concurred. — Judgment reversed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J.L. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryerson-v-kitchell-nj-1807.