Ryer v. Winter
This text of 79 A. 1119 (Ryer v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decision rendered by the Supreme Court in this ease has already been disapproved by this court in Sadler v. Young, 49 Vroom 594, 597. For the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Chief Justice in the latter case, the judgment of the Supreme Court in the ease now under review will be reversed, and the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff in error will be affirmed, with costs, in this court and in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—None.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garríson, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Voorhees, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, Sullivan, JJ. 12.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 A. 1119, 81 N.J.L. 575, 52 Vroom 575, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryer-v-winter-nj-1911.