Rye Town/King Civic Ass'n v. Town of Rye

New York Court of Appeals

Rye Town/King Civic Ass'n v. Town of Rye

439 N.E.2d 397, 56 N.Y.2d 985, 453 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3534

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 439 N.E.2d 397 (Rye Town/King Civic Ass'n v. Town of Rye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rye Town/King Civic Ass'n v. Town of Rye, 439 N.E.2d 397, 56 N.Y.2d 985, 453 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3534 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

opinion of the court

Memorandum.

The motion for leave to appeal should be dismissed as untimely.

A party who has mistaken the method for obtaining appellate review is entitled to a 30-day extension of time within which to pursue the proper method of appeal (CPLR 5514, subd [a]). In such circumstances, however, an adverse party who initially did not either appeal as of right under CPLR 5513 (subd [a]), or move for leave to appeal under CPLR 5513 (subd [b]), or cross-appeal or cross-move for leave to appeal under CPLR 5513 (subd [c]), may not avail itself of the 10-day extension provided by CPLR 5513 (subd [c]).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed in a memorandum, with twenty dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to intervenor-respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

opinion of the court

Memorandum.

The motion for leave to appeal should be dismissed as untimely.

A party who has mistaken the method for obtaining appellate review is entitled to a 30-day extension of time within which to pursue the proper method of appeal (CPLR 5514, subd [a]). In such circumstances, however, an adverse party who initially did not either appeal as of right under CPLR 5513 (subd [a]), or move for leave to appeal under CPLR 5513 (subd [b]), or cross-appeal or cross-move for leave to appeal under CPLR 5513 (subd [c]), may not avail itself of the 10-day extension provided by CPLR 5513 (subd [c]).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed in a memorandum, with twenty dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to intervenor-respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

439 N.E.2d 397, 56 N.Y.2d 985, 453 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rye-townking-civic-assn-v-town-of-rye-ny-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack