Rydzewski v. Rydzewski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rydzewski v. Rydzewski

577 So. 2d 672, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2929, 1991 WL 45205

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 2, 1991

DocketNo. 90-407

StatusPublished

This text of 577 So. 2d 672 (Rydzewski v. Rydzewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rydzewski v. Rydzewski, 577 So. 2d 672, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2929, 1991 WL 45205 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals from an amended final judgment of dissolution of marriage and from orders denying his motion to vacate and denying rehearing.

It is clear from the record and from the final judgment that the trial court did not consider the tax implications of the relief ordered. Furthermore, in the final judgment, the trial court ordered the City of Hialeah, which was not a party to this action, to pay to the wife a stated amount from the husband’s employee savings plan.

We remand this cause to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on the tax implications of the property distribution, and, following that hearing, to either amend or clarify the final judgment concerning its findings. On remand, we direct the trial court to delete from the final judgment all language ordering a non-party to take any action.

As to the remaining points on appeal, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI