Ryder v. Toyota Motor Sales Co.
This text of 419 So. 2d 551 (Ryder v. Toyota Motor Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons contained in Myrtle Faye Royle v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 419 So.2d 547, docket number 82-129, in which we render a separate decision this date, the judgments of the trial court are reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our views expressed in the opinion in the Myrtle Faye Royle case cited above.
The costs of this appeal are assessed in equal portions to movers Myrtle Faye Royle, Terrance Keith Royle and Toyota Motor Sales Limited.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 So. 2d 551, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 7925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryder-v-toyota-motor-sales-co-lactapp-1982.