Ryder v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 1060, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2171
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided October 28, 1925·No. Docket No. 2129.·Published

Opinion

[1061] OPINION.

Ivins:

The taxpayer kept his accounts and filed his return on a cash basis. The liquidating dividend on the 115 shares was not received by the taxpayer until 1922. The sale of the wool by the corporation in 1921 did not constitute a receipt by the stockholder. It was but a necessary step preliminary to a later liquidation distribution.

The taxpayer knew nothing of the sale of the wool until he received the check in January, 1922, and he thereafter forwarded his stock certificate for the 115 shares to the corporation. No loss should be deducted against 1921 income for that transaction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryder v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 1060, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2171 (bta 1925).

2 B.T.A. 1060 (Ryder v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal of Ryder
2 B.T.A. 1060 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)