Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Lewis
This text of 88 A.D.2d 788 (Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The rule in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594) requires the unconditional dismissal of this action for failure to serve a complaint (CPLR 3012, subd [b]). The attorney’s allegation of illness was unsupported by medical documentation and no explanation was given why he did not recommend that other counsel be retained (see Wolfe v Town of Hempstead, Dept, of Parks & Recreation, 75 AD2d 811; see, also, Premo v Cornell, 83 AD2d 981; Catón v Schenectady Gazette, 82 AD2d 949). The bulk of the delay appears to have been caused by a shortage of secretarial staff. This explanation falls within the category of “law office failure” (see City of New York v Ingber, 80 AD2d 773). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Stone, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 A.D.2d 788, 451 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryder-truck-rental-inc-v-lewis-nyappdiv-1982.