Rydell v. Greenhut & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rydell v. Greenhut & Co.

140 A.D. 926, 125 N.Y.S. 838

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam:

The judgment and order appealed from'must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event for the error" of the court in refusing to charge that “if the plaintiff was guilty of any negligence, no matter how slight, which contributed to the accident, the verdict must be for the defendant.”' Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, .Miller and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam:

The judgment and order appealed from'must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event for the error" of the court in refusing to charge that “if the plaintiff was guilty of any negligence, no matter how slight, which contributed to the accident, the verdict must be for the defendant.”' Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, .Miller and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Rydell v. Greenhut & Co., 140 A.D. 926, 125 N.Y.S. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

140 A.D. 926 (Rydell v. Greenhut & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related