Rycraw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rycraw v. State

575 S.W.3d 507

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 21, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106228

StatusPublished

This text of 575 S.W.3d 507 (Rycraw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rycraw v. State, 575 S.W.3d 507 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Antonio Rycraw ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted after a jury trial of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 RSMo, and two counts of sexual misconduct in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.095. Movant was sentenced to concurrent 12-year sentences on each of the first-degree statutory sodomy counts and 120 days on each of the sexual misconduct counts. On direct appeal this Court reversed the convictions for sexual misconduct in the second degree, and affirmed the convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy. See State v. Rycraw, 507 S.W.3d 47 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Antonio Rycraw ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted after a jury trial of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 RSMo, and two counts of sexual misconduct in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.095. Movant was sentenced to concurrent 12-year sentences on each of the first-degree statutory sodomy counts and 120 days on each of the sexual misconduct counts. On direct appeal this Court reversed the convictions for sexual misconduct in the second degree, and affirmed the convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy. See State v. Rycraw, 507 S.W.3d 47 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 S.W.3d 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rycraw-v-state-moctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack