Ryckman v. Parkins

9 Wend. 470
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1833
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 9 Wend. 470 (Ryckman v. Parkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryckman v. Parkins, 9 Wend. 470 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The slander in this case was of a wanton and wicked character, imputing to the plaintiff a crime of the most atrocious nature; and when the great wealth of the defendant is taken into consideration, there is nothing in the case to induce the suspicion of prejudice, partiality or corruption on the part of the jury in finding a verdict against the defendant to the amount of $7000. In McConnell v. Hampton, 12 Johns. R. 234, where a verdict for $9000 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in an action of false imprisonment, the court ordered a new trial; but in that case there were mitigating circumstances ; here there are none. The order to stay proceedings is therefore vacated, and the plaintiff is at liberty to enter judgment upon the verdict, notwithstanding the case made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. Cincinnati Enquirer
10 F. Cas. 311 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1877)
Shaw v. Boston & Worcester Railroad
74 Mass. 45 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1857)
Woodruff v. Fisher
17 Barb. 224 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Coffin v. Coffin
4 Mass. 1 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1808)
Brett v. Hood
1 Cai. Cas. 343 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Wend. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryckman-v-parkins-nysupct-1833.