Home/New York Supreme Court/Ryckman v. Haight

Ryckman v. Haight

15 Johns. 222
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1818
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 15 Johns. 222 (Ryckman v. Haight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryckman v. Haight, 15 Johns. 222 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The practice of this court Is merely to compel the plaintiff to specify the particulars of his demand. We consider thé bill of particulars as an amplification of the counts in. the declaration. The defendant must know, as well' as the plaintiffs, whát sums he hás paid, and [223]*223if he is furnished with the debit side of the account, he can readily ascertain the balance claimed.

The defendant must take his rulé, that the plaintiffs furnish a bill of the particulars of their demand, exclusive of credits for payments by the defendant, in ten days, or that a judgment of nonpros be entered.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ball v. Evening Post Publishing Co.
55 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 149 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Auzerais v. Naglee
15 P. 371 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Case v. . Pharis
12 N.E. 431 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Western Transp. Co. v. Great Western
29 F. Cas. 777 (N.D. New York, 1862)
Benedict v. Swain
43 N.H. 33 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
The Revenue Cutter No. 1
20 F. Cas. 560 (N.D. Ohio, 1860)
Williams v. Allen
7 Cow. 316 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)
Brewster v. Sackett
1 Cow. 571 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Johns. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryckman-v-haight-nysupct-1818.