Ryckman v. Gleich

Wyoming Supreme Court

Ryckman v. Gleich

148 P. 1151, 23 Wyo. 262, 1915 Wyo. LEXIS 26

CourtWyoming Supreme Court

DecidedMay 10, 1915

DocketNo. 499

StatusPublished

This text of 148 P. 1151 (Ryckman v. Gleich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryckman v. Gleich, 148 P. 1151, 23 Wyo. 262, 1915 Wyo. LEXIS 26 (Wyo. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Potter, Chief Justice.

This was an action for the recovery of a money judgment, and there was a counter claim. The plaintiff below has brought the case here on error. There is no bill of exceptions in the case and the only point suggested in the brief that can be considered is the contention that the judgment is not sustained by the findings. There was a judgment for the plaintiff for $117.10, conditioned, however, upon the return of certain chattels, found to have been delivered to the plaintiff by defendant as collateral security. The contention is that the findings show a balance due to the plaintiff of $317.10, and therefore that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff should be for that amount. But we think counsel is clearly mistaken in this. As we read the findings the amount of the balance found to be due to the plaintiff is $117.10, the amount of'the judgment. The judgment will be affirmed.

Scott, J., concurs. Beard, Justice, having been of counsel in the case below, did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter, Chief Justice.

This was an action for the recovery of a money judgment, and there was a counter claim. The plaintiff below has brought the case here on error. There is no bill of exceptions in the case and the only point suggested in the brief that can be considered is the contention that the judgment is not sustained by the findings. There was a judgment for the plaintiff for $117.10, conditioned, however, upon the return of certain chattels, found to have been delivered to the plaintiff by defendant as collateral security. The contention is that the findings show a balance due to the plaintiff of $317.10, and therefore that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff should be for that amount. But we think counsel is clearly mistaken in this. As we read the findings the amount of the balance found to be due to the plaintiff is $117.10, the amount of'the judgment. The judgment will be affirmed.

Scott, J., concurs. Beard, Justice, having been of counsel in the case below, did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 P. 1151, 23 Wyo. 262, 1915 Wyo. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryckman-v-gleich-wyo-1915.