Rybak v. State Employees' Retirement Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rybak v. State Employees' Retirement Board

649 A.2d 431, 538 Pa. 476, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 590

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 31, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to strike the portions of appellant’s brief that address matters not encompassed by this- Court’s grant of allowance of appeal, which was limited to the issue of equal protection, is granted. The order of the Commonwealth Court, 154 Pa.Cmwlth. 586, 624 A.2d 286, is affirmed. See Harper v. State Employees’ Retirement System, 538 Pa. 520, 649 A.2d 643 (1993).

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to strike the portions of appellant’s brief that address matters not encompassed by this- Court’s grant of allowance of appeal, which was limited to the issue of equal protection, is granted. The order of the Commonwealth Court, 154 Pa.Cmwlth. 586, 624 A.2d 286, is affirmed. See Harper v. State Employees’ Retirement System, 538 Pa. 520, 649 A.2d 643 (1993).

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Rybak v. State Employees' Retirement Board, 649 A.2d 431, 538 Pa. 476, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 590 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

649 A.2d 431 (Rybak v. State Employees' Retirement Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related