Ryan v. Ryan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ryan v. Ryan

881 So. 2d 739, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13735, 2004 WL 2071211

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 2004

DocketNo. 5D04-6

StatusPublished

This text of 881 So. 2d 739 (Ryan v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan v. Ryan, 881 So. 2d 739, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13735, 2004 WL 2071211 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Daniel Ryan appeals an order setting aside a default. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because this is a non-final order that is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a). See Tieche v. Florida Physicians Ins. Reciprocal, 431 So.2d 287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); see also Bruno v. A.E. Handy & Associates, Inc., 787 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Kolb v. Florida Fruit & Vegetable Ass’n. Inc., 718 So.2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

Daniel Ryan appeals an order setting aside a default. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because this is a non-final order that is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a). See Tieche v. Florida Physicians Ins. Reciprocal, 431 So.2d 287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); see also Bruno v. A.E. Handy & Associates, Inc., 787 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Kolb v. Florida Fruit & Vegetable Ass’n. Inc., 718 So.2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

881 So. 2d 739, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13735, 2004 WL 2071211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-ryan-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack