Ryan v. Ryan
881 So. 2d 739, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13735, 2004 WL 2071211
Opinion
Daniel Ryan appeals an order setting aside a default. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because this is a non-final order that is not appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a). See Tieche v. Florida Physicians Ins. Reciprocal, 431 So.2d 287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); see also Bruno v. A.E. Handy & Associates, Inc., 787 So.2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Kolb v. Florida Fruit & Vegetable Ass’n. Inc., 718 So.2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ryan v. Ryan, 881 So. 2d 739, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13735, 2004 WL 2071211 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
881 So. 2d 739 (Ryan v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tieche v. Fla. Physicians Ins. Reciprocal
431 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Kolb v. FL. FRUIT & VEGETABLE ASS'N, INC.
718 So. 2d 957 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Bruno v. AE Handy & Associates, Inc.
787 So. 2d 251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)