Ryan v. New Jersey Ice Cream Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ryan v. New Jersey Ice Cream Co.

1 N.J. Misc. 347, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129

DecidedJune 7, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J. Misc. 347 (Ryan v. New Jersey Ice Cream Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan v. New Jersey Ice Cream Co., 1 N.J. Misc. 347, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129 (N.J. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s decedent was killed in an accident resulting in a collision between the defendant’s truck and a Buick car, driven by one Borschel. The decedent was crossing the street when the truck struck her. The chief ground urged [348]*348in favor of the rule is that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. We think it was not contrary to the weight of the evidence as against the driver of the truck. The question of the negligence of Btorschel is not presented by the case.

The rule must be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s decedent was killed in an accident resulting in a collision between the defendant’s truck and a Buick car, driven by one Borschel. The decedent was crossing the street when the truck struck her. The chief ground urged [348]*348in favor of the rule is that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. We think it was not contrary to the weight of the evidence as against the driver of the truck. The question of the negligence of Btorschel is not presented by the case.

The rule must be discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.J. Misc. 347, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-new-jersey-ice-cream-co-nj-1923.