Ryan v. Moran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ryan v. Moran

124 A.D.2d 586, 507 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61896

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[587] To the extent that the order entered April 9, 1985, denied the motion to renew, Special Term was correct. The petitioners did not present, as they were required to, new material facts justifying the granting of renewal (see, Matter of Annis v New York City Tr. Auth., 108 AD2d 643). To the extent that Special Term’s order denied the motion to reargue, it is not appealable (see, Montalvo v Key Indus., 98 AD2d 767). In any event, the motion to reargue was untimely made (see, Henegar v Freudenheim, 40 AD2d 825). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[587] To the extent that the order entered April 9, 1985, denied the motion to renew, Special Term was correct. The petitioners did not present, as they were required to, new material facts justifying the granting of renewal (see, Matter of Annis v New York City Tr. Auth., 108 AD2d 643). To the extent that Special Term’s order denied the motion to reargue, it is not appealable (see, Montalvo v Key Indus., 98 AD2d 767). In any event, the motion to reargue was untimely made (see, Henegar v Freudenheim, 40 AD2d 825). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Ryan v. Moran, 124 A.D.2d 586, 507 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

124 A.D.2d 586 (Ryan v. Moran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related