Ryan v. Moran
This text of 124 A.D.2d 586 (Ryan v. Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[587]*587To the extent that the order entered April 9, 1985, denied the motion to renew, Special Term was correct. The petitioners did not present, as they were required to, new material facts justifying the granting of renewal (see, Matter of Annis v New York City Tr. Auth., 108 AD2d 643). To the extent that Special Term’s order denied the motion to reargue, it is not appealable (see, Montalvo v Key Indus., 98 AD2d 767). In any event, the motion to reargue was untimely made (see, Henegar v Freudenheim, 40 AD2d 825). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.2d 586, 507 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-moran-nyappdiv-1986.