Ryan v. Miami Railway Co.

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 399
Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided July 1, 1898·Published

Opinion

Caldwell, J.,

in an oral opinion, held that Ferris is only entitled to the amount which he would have received had there been no composition between the stockholders and the other creditors, and the stock had been assessed to the full amount, and each creditor had received his pro rata share, it being conceded that the stock would not have yielded enough to have paid the creditors in full.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan v. Miami Railway Co., 9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 399 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 399 (Ryan v. Miami Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.