Ryan v. Herzog
This text of Ryan v. Herzog (Ryan v. Herzog) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000595 23-JUN-2016 11:26 AM
SCWC-13-0000595
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
RUTH RYAN,
Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant/Appellee,
vs.
JOHN HERZOG,
Petitioner/Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-13-0000595; DC-CIVIL NO. 08-1-0948)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant John
Herzog’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May 9, 2016,
is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 23, 2016.
John Herzog /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
petitioner pro se
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ryan v. Herzog, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-herzog-haw-2016.