Ryan v. Herzog

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ryan v. Herzog. Read the opinion of the Court — 418 P.3d 619
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 2016·No. SCWC-13-0000595·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0000595

23-JUN-2016

11:26 AM

SCWC-13-0000595

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

RUTH RYAN,

Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant/Appellee,

vs.

JOHN HERZOG,

Petitioner/Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000595; DC-CIVIL NO. 08-1-0948)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant John Herzog’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May 9, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 23, 2016.

John Herzog /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan v. Herzog, (haw 2016).

Ryan v. Herzog (Ryan v. Herzog) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.