Ryan v. Frank L. Hall Co.
202 A.D. 780
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ryan v. Frank L. Hall Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D. 874 →
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, while the evidence as to damages is unsatisfactory, we think there is enough to have warranted the jury in finding more than nominal damages; and besides, the judge seems to have charged the jury, without exception, that the plaintiff was entitled upon the evidence to recover what the services of the physician were reasonably worth.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ryan v. Frank L. Hall Co., 202 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
202 A.D. 780 (Ryan v. Frank L. Hall Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.