Ryan v. Duffy

54 A.D. 199, 66 N.Y.S. 649
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1900·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff seeks to excuse his delay in making this application "because he did not learn the facts until shortly before the motion was made. But this excuse appears only by the affidavit of his .attorney. The plaintiff himself is not sworn. This defect is fatal, and for this reason the denial of the motion was correct and the •order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice, however, to the right of the plaintiff, upon payment of the costs of the appeal and of the motion below, to renew ■upon proper papers.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Ingraham, McLaughlin and Hatch, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right, on payment of costs of appeal and motion below, to renew on proper papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan v. Duffy, 54 A.D. 199, 66 N.Y.S. 649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

54 A.D. 199 (Ryan v. Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Driscoll v. Parker Pen Co.
141 N.Y.S. 251 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Barrell v. Van Wagenen
95 N.Y.S. 1113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Treadwell v. Clark
45 Misc. 268 (New York Supreme Court, 1904)
Barnum v. Williams
91 A.D. 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Mutual Loan Ass'n v. Lesser
81 A.D. 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Tompkins v. Continental National Bank
71 A.D. 330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)