Ryan v. Donovan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ryan v. Donovan

32 Misc. 719, 65 N.Y.S. 1144

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 719 (Ryan v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan v. Donovan, 32 Misc. 719, 65 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was assumed on the trial (see particularly the charge of the trial court) that the only question in dispute related to the carting of the brick and to the amount due for sand. It was shown by competent evidence on the part of the plaintiffs that the defendant was entitled to $865.42 for carting brick, and to $432.71 for sand. It was conceded that defendant was entitled to $217.30 for other things, making a total of $1,515.43 and no more, to which the defendant was entitled. It was taken for granted on the trial that plaintiffs had paid the defendant $1,600 in cash, and there was competent evidence tending to show that they had paid out on defendant’s account for sand and cartage the sum of $292.37, making a total of $1,892.37. The verdict was for $372.19, and is amply sustained by the evidence. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It was assumed on the trial (see particularly the charge of the trial court) that the only question in dispute related to the carting of the brick and to the amount due for sand. It was shown by competent evidence on the part of the plaintiffs that the defendant was entitled to $865.42 for carting brick, and to $432.71 for sand. It was conceded that defendant was entitled to $217.30 for other things, making a total of $1,515.43 and no more, to which the defendant was entitled. It was taken for granted on the trial that plaintiffs had paid the defendant $1,600 in cash, and there was competent evidence tending to show that they had paid out on defendant’s account for sand and cartage the sum of $292.37, making a total of $1,892.37. The verdict was for $372.19, and is amply sustained by the evidence. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Misc. 719, 65 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-donovan-nyappterm-1900.