Ryan v. Cunningham

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 26, 2026
Docket332 CA 25-00978
StatusPublished

This text of Ryan v. Cunningham (Ryan v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryan v. Cunningham, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Ryan v Cunningham - 2026 NY Slip Op 04067
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Ryan v Cunningham

2026 NY Slip Op 04067

June 26, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

PAUL RYAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

SUSAN CUNNINGHAM, ALAN LINCOLN, NANCY KERRIGAN, CHARLIE BERNET, KRISTA TASKEY, DIANA MARLEY, DAVID SMART, HUNTWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE, LLC, AND MURRAY LANDSCAPING, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on June 26, 2026

332 CA 25-00978

Present: Lindley, J.P., Bannister, Montour, Greenwood, And Hannah, JJ.

PAUL RYAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

CERIO LAW OFFICES, SYRACUSE (DAVID W. HERKALA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT SUSAN CUNNINGHAM.

SMITH SOVIK KENDRICK & SUGNET P.C., SYRACUSE (GARDAR G. OLAFSSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ALAN LINCOLN, NANCY KERRIGAN,

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Robert E. Antonacci, II, J.), entered March 25, 2025. The order denied plaintiff's application for an order to show cause.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order insofar as it denied his application for an order to show cause seeking the removal of a wall erected adjacent to a back deck by his adjoining townhome neighbor. We conclude that the appeal must be dismissed because "no appeal lies . . . from the denial of an application to sign an order to show cause" (Quattrone v Erie 2 Chautauqua-Cattaraugus Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 243 AD3d 1337, 1338 [4th Dept 2025] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see M.B. v F.B., 235 AD3d 497, 498 [1st Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 901 [2025]).

Entered: June 26, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ryan v. Cunningham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-cunningham-nyappdiv-2026.